Hurix Systems Private Ltd.
Republicans and Democrats can squabble endlessly over the percentages of territory each will cede, but this is the broad framework that we are likely headed towards. And yet, no agreement has been reached.
As it does, many Americans may find the deadlock in the Middle East eerily familiar. Indeed, Washington's recent failure to negotiate a "Grand Bargain" over its fiscal policy and the failure of negotiations to end the Palestinian-Israeli conflict share a similar underlying cause: In both cases, those on the political extreme have easily blocked a weakened political center from making a difficult compromise.
Of course, these two negotiations could not take place in more different circumstances. Palestinians and Israelis are involved in an often existential conflict between two peoples, each of whom has suffered horribly.
Their conflict, moreover, has been exacerbated by stark ideological, religious, and economic differences both between and within the two sides, as well as by cynical third parties, such as the current Iranian regime.
In contrast, American politics is peaceful and democratic and all sides in Washington have the legitimate right to represent their viewpoint. Yet, despite these enormous differences, both negotiations remain trapped in the same fundamental paradox: In the Israeli-Palestinian context, the basic outline of a two-state solution has been known for a decade.
In exchange for full peace, Israel would withdraw from nearly all territories beyond the pre lines with mutually agreed land swaps to cover the major settlement blocs.
Both sides would need to compromise on what's holy: And they would need mechanisms to keep the peace on everything from security to resource-sharing.
In the American context, the essential outline of a Grand Bargain is also well known to many policy-makers on both sides of the aisle. To stabilize the economy, we need renewed short-term stimulus combined with medium-term debt reduction, even as we still increase long-term investments in key areas like infrastructure, science and technology, and education.
As with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the two sides must compromise on what's holy to their bases: It's not for lack of trying. Indeed, over the past two years Washington has, perhaps unintentionally, replicated many of the same negotiating tactics that Israelis and Palestinians have used.
We've put together an independent commission, Simpson-Bowles, to come to an "expert" consensus -- the Israeli-Palestinian version is the similarly unimplemented Geneva Initiative. We've tried our equivalent of a Camp David Summit -- the failed Obama-Boehner negotiations of last summer.
We're now even trying secret diplomacy in an attempt to stave off the impending fiscal cliff.
It's also not for lack of consequences.A political party is best defined as a. a group of people who promote the public good but differ essentially on the means of promoting that good. b. a group of people who organize to win elections, operate government, and determine policy.
Since the s, the topic of divided government has been among the most prominent topics explored by scholars of American political institutions.
Divided government means that different parties control the legislative and executive branches of the American national government. A new survey from the Pew Research Center reveals that political polarization in the United States has reached a dangerous extreme.
The gap between what Democrats and Republicans believe is. Political polarization is the defining feature of early 21st century American politics, both among the public and elected officials. Our study finds that Republicans and Democrats are further apart than at .
Does ‘divided government’ in the US facilitate decision-making, or encourage deadlock, and the persistence of the status quo? In almost all developed democratic countries, such as UK, Japan or Germany, political parties are growingly closer and cooperative together, whereas the US is an exception.
Political Polarization in American Politics provides short, accessible chapters about the nature and extent of political polarization within the American public and in American political institutions. These chapters capture the central ideas and debates in political science research on polarization, and are written by leading scholars in this subfield.4/5(2).