Those who enter must surrender any cell phones, tablets or cameras, remove caps and pass through a metal detector. Weapons are kept in locked glass cases, unlike many of the 50,plus U. Legally getting your hands on one, however, requires clearing a series of bureaucratic hurdles far stricter than in the U.
InSunnyvale, California, banned high-capacity magazines. An appeals court agreed and the Supreme Court refused to consider the issue further. While they are subject to minimal federal regulation and already banned in 10 states, they are easily obtained and big sellers.
There is no reason anyone outside of law enforcement or the military needs one except to kill people without attracting attention. Beyond accessories, other changes in gun laws are needed to accomplish what everyone in the debate agrees is a laudable goal: Keep firearms out of the hands of bad guys.
Unfortunately, the NRA has been working for years to make sure lunatics and felons can obtain guns as easily as possible. When introduced, the legislation called on states to submit mental-health records to national databases maintained by the FBI. The NRA declared this violated the Second Amendment and, through intense lobbying, limited the definition of mental illness only to people institutionalized or found by a court to be a danger.
Over exhibitors from some the most important firearm companies came to the show which drew thousands of gun consumers. In the past, because of concerns that an unbalanced person could relapse after treatment, the rules provided that anyone prohibited from having a gun for psychological reasons was banned forever.
Now a person committed to a mental hospital can, after getting out, petition a court for his guns. And by lobbying state legislatures, the NRA made sure psychiatric experts play a puny role in determining if a former mental patient should have a gun.
Instead, in places like Idaho, state judges who are ill-equipped to make such a determination do it with no input from experts. According to the NRA, every armed madman or criminal is a responsible, law-abiding good guy with a gun until the moment his first bullet splatters the walls with the brains and blood of innocent people.
So ignore the extremists. The only way to keep guns out of the hands of bad guys is to figure out who they are before they get armed. That means universal background checks and record-keeping requirements for all firearms transactions.
Under federal law, purchases from a licensed gun dealer require identification, and a form stating the buyer is purchasing it for himself and is not part of a group prohibited from obtaining a gun—felons, people under felony indictment, drug addicts, fugitives and the like.
Then, after a background check 90 percent of them take a few minutesthe sale is complete. The dealer makes a record of the transaction and keeps it permanently. This is wonderful for a criminal—or a psychopath.
Private parties are allowed to sell at gun shows—and anywhere else. Polls show overwhelming support for checks—as much as 92 percent in a Quinnipiac University poll from last year, including 86 percent of Republicans. But first the background check process has to be tightened up across the board, as was made obvious in the case of Dylann Roof, the man arrested for the recent shooting spree in an African Methodist Episcopal church in Charleston, South Carolina.
He was charged in February with possession of a prescription narcotic, which would have prohibited a dealer from selling him a firearm.
Under the rules, the government had three days to check out Roof. Because of a mix-up, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was still trying to obtain his arrest record after the three days passed.Should the Government Allow Citizens a Right to own Guns?
I think the readers should take a course in the Bill of Rights. The 2nd Amendment states that this Right Shall not be Infringed.
Astute legal scholars will remind you that the Second Amendment is a negative right—that it protects the right to own guns, but that nothing obligates the government to make sure everyone. One thing our media, themselves so heavily vested in securing Draconian gun control here as they are, steadfastly refuses to acknowledge is the fact that American gun owners do stop gun and other crime frequently through the use of their own legal guns.
Pro-gun advocates claim that this amendment guarantees their individual right to own a gun, and that gun control laws are therefore a violation of their constitutional rights. In fact, the term "violation of our Second Amendment rights" has become a battle cry in gun lobbyist literature, repeated everywhere in their editorials and essays.
If American citizens did not own firearms, the United States would not have been born in even more than a civil right; it is one of the . Gun rights and gun control are always hot items during any political discussion, whether it is between peers or politicians.
One of the many great advantages to being an American is the ability to choose for one's own self what to believe in. Another advantage, in my opinion, is .